Call 918 582 1313 for a free consultation.
This is an important concept in criminal law. When a judge says that something is a "question of fact" what the judge is saying is that sufficient evidence exist to create a factual question that must be resolved by a trier of fact. Most often a trier of fact is a jury. However, in some situations it is the judge that is the trier of fact. (Such as if both parties waive the right to a jury trial and choose to have a "bench trial")
Often times when a defendant hears the judge refer to something as a "question of fact" it is bad news. It means that the defense motion, whether a motion to quash or dismiss, has been denied by the Court. However, sometimes it is good news for a defendant, such as when the defendant request a jury instruction that the state is objecting to; in that scenerio the judge ruling that something was a question of fact indicates that there is sufficient evidence to submit that question to a jury.
"Where a fact question is found, a jury then steps in to determine the issue" (See Martinez v State, 80 P.3d 142, 14 (Okla.Cr. 2003)
I try to respond to all inquires as quickly as possible. If you need immediate assistance you can call my office (918) 582-1313 or my cell phone (918) 230-9513. If you are in need of emergency assistance feel free to call my cell phone anytime either day or night.